Secret life of algae: From oxygen to algae blooms

Secret life of algae. Posted by Ocean Generation

Every second breath we take comes from the Ocean. More specifically, it comes from algae in the Ocean (thank you, algae).   

When the conditions are right, algae flourishes, creating an algal bloom. These blooms can be spectacular, leading to a blossoming of life and a sparkling Ocean, or they can cause serious problems for life in the Ocean and on land.

What do the white cliffs of Dover, the oil fields in the North Sea and Colorado oil shales and the clarifying agents used to make beer and wine have in common? They are all made of algae, a diverse group of incredible organisms which support most of the life in the Ocean.  

But you can have too much of a good thing. Large amounts of algae can kill a lot of marine life and be toxic to humans. These events can have huge impacts, as we will see, from modern day Australia to the Bible.  

What are algae

This isnโ€™t as simple an answer as it should be, so bear with us. Unlike mammals or birds or sharks (donโ€™t get us started on โ€œfishโ€), โ€œalgaeโ€ doesnโ€™t refer to a single evolutionary group of species.  

Instead, the things we call algae are a group of organisms that do the same kind of things, dotted around the tree of life. A group of roughly 50,000 species.  

The name comes from the Latin for โ€œseaweedโ€. The study of algae is called phycology, and algal experts are phycologists, who are still figuring out exactly how they all fit together.  

As a good rule of thumb โ€“ if it photosynthesises, and it isnโ€™t a land plant, it is algae (we will get to the differences between algae and plants in a minute).  

Some of those 50,000 species are very basic organisms such as cyanobacteria, that lack a nucleus and the other advanced bits of cellular equipment that animals have.  

Other species are single-celled, floating around in the Ocean. Some are macroalgae like kelp, growing over 50m tall, creating vast forests filled with life and noise (ever wondered what the kelp forest sounds like?).  

The magic of algae is something they share with plants. They produce oxygen and grow using sunlight โ€“ photosynthesis.  

This magic is what nearly all life on our planet is dependent on.  

How are algae different from plants

Fuelled by the sun’s energy, algae filled the Ocean and some conquered the land, becoming the plants that dominate our planet.  

Plants evolved from ancient freshwater algae over 440 million years ago. Trees appeared around 400 million years ago. Psst… for context, sharks first appeared around 450 million years ago, so sharks have been around for longer than trees. 1-0 to the sharks.  

Plants have developed into some beautiful, complex forms, conquering the land and making up around 82.5% of total biomass (the weight of living things) โ€“ humans are only about 0.01%.  

Meanwhile, algae have evolved to master the aquatic world.  

Physical differences between algae and plants 

Plants developed a number of structures as they conquered the land, with roots to hold them in place and specialised structures for capturing sunlight โ€“ leaves.  

Looking at seaweed there are clear similarities. The โ€œrootsโ€ of seaweed are holdfasts, the โ€œstemโ€ is a stipe, and the โ€œleavesโ€ are blades. They look similar, but these structures donโ€™t transport nutrients or gases between each other as the plant equivalents do. 

Microscopic algae lack these structures completely.  

How are algae and plants different: explained by Ocean Generation

What are the biochemical differences between algae and plants? 

We wonโ€™t get too technical, but there are some big differences in the biochemistry of the two. Algae are much more varied in their structures, using a wider variety of building materials. Some use silica (glass) and some create chalk. Green algae use a compound called cellulose โ€“ the sugar that makes up paper, cotton t-shirts and wood.  

Plants, evolving from these algae, adapted cellulose into compounds such as lignin for structural support in their ongoing battle against gravity. 

Many algae are named after their eclectic use of photosynthetic pigments 

Red algae use phycoerythrin and phycocyanin (which appear red), brown algae use fucoxanthin giving them a golden-brown colour and green algae use the same chlorophyll a and b as their green, leafy land-based relatives.  

The different pigments are utilised to ensure that the algae are most efficiently gathering the sunโ€™s light, which is filtered by the water, modifying the wavelength (and therefore colour) of light that most gets through. More on that another time.  

Types of macroalgae, explained by Ocean Generation.

Where can you find algae? 

You can find algae everywhere, and each habitat has its own name. They can be found in ice (cryophilic) and hot springs (thermophilic).  

Algae are also in soil (edaphic) and in the Ocean (planktonic in the water column and neustonic on the surface). On rocks and in coral (epilithic and endolithic), on fungus and other plants (epiphytic), on turtles and sloths (epizoic) and even inside other organisms (endozoic endosymbiotic) – there is an alga for any location.  

Someone should make a song about it.  

Why do algae bloom?  

When algae grow very fast into large numbers, itโ€™s referred to as a bloom. This can happen at small scales in a pond or at huge scales visible from space. These blooms can be the start of a great flourishing of life, or a deadly threat. 

To understand why algae might bloom we need to realise why it wouldnโ€™t and identify what is limiting its growth. Both plants and algae growth are limited by several things: watertemperaturelight and nutrients.  

We are focusing in on the marine, where water is less of a concern, so short term variation is typically controlled by the rest (although how salty the water is does matter). 

Different algal species will have different preferred conditions, but warming the Ocean, with more sunlight and more nutrients, would generally result in more algae.  

To refine it further, algal blooms typically refer to large amounts of microscopic algae. A kelp forest is technically an algal bloom too, but in headlines, โ€˜algal bloomโ€™ usually means the small stuff that can produce massive blooms.  

Increasing light and temperature 

Algal blooms are a normal part of the seasonal Ocean, as light and temperature increase in spring and summer, they allow algae to grow. This growth, like the arrival of spring on land, can be spectacular, as the sea sparkles with bioluminescent algae such as Noctiluca sp. which can give off a blue glow.  

What happens in spring that might cause this? The days get longer and the temperature rises. More light and higher temperatures encourage algae to bloom, and they will until one of the other conditions becomes the limit.  

Why do algae bloom? Explained by Ocean Generation, leaders in Ocean education

Increased nutrients 

When light and temperature are in plentiful supply in the summer months, the growth of marine algae is limited by nutrient levels, especially nitrogen (as opposed to freshwater, where it is phosphorus).  

Human activities, primarily the use of fertiliser in agriculture, which is rich in nitrates, have altered the cycling of nitrogen. Some areas of Ocean receive much higher levels of nitrogen from water running off farms, giving the algae all the ingredients they need to thrive and bloom. 

Lowered salinity 

A lower level of salinity (saltiness in the water) means a higher concentration of water, enabling more growth. An increase in rainfall or ice melting could then lead to an algal bloom.  

What makes an algae bloom harmful

Broadly speaking there are two ways algal blooms can make life a bit rubbish for everything around it – by choking or poisoning them.  

Choking blooms 

When a large bloom of algae happens, it can disrupt the balance of the ecosystem.  

But the real dangers come in the aftermath. As the bloom subsides, it is decomposed by bacteria and other organisms, which use oxygen. This can leave little or no oxygen in the water left for fish and other aquatic residents to breathe.  

What makes algal blooms harmful? Posted by Ocean Generation.

Which Bible story might have an algal bloom?  

You may not think to go to the Bible for marine science but let us look at the story of Moses and the plagues of Egypt in Exodus 7: 20-21: โ€œ…all the waters that were in the river were turned to blood. And the fish that were in the river died; and the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink the water of the riverโ€. If we assume the bit about blood is descriptive rather than literal, we have a good description of a bloom of red algae.  

Following this, we can link some of the other plagues that befell Ancient Egypt. To recap, the ten plagues were: river of blood, frogs, mosquitoes, flies, death of livestock, boils, hail, locusts, darkness and the death of each firstborn son.  

If there was an algal bloom that suffocated the Nile, killing many of the fish, then the things the fish ate would benefit, if they could survive low oxygen conditions. Something like a tadpole, which can respond physiologically to low oxygen conditions and thrive. With no fish, you could end up with a lot of tadpoles surviving, and… a plague of frogs.

Another winner would be mosquitos โ€“ they lay their eggs on water surface, and the larvae feed on algae. With less predators (the fish are dead) to eat them and a banquet of food, you get a plague of mosquitos. 

The death of much of the life of the river could poison the waters, resulting in the deaths of many of the livestock which depend on those waters to drink. The decay attracts flies, meaning one big algae bloom could be exactly the tool a deity would wield to cause five plagues.  

Another algal alternative is that the red โ€œbloodโ€ came as a result of heavy rainfall in the Ethiopian mountains that are the source of the Nile. The soil there is clay โ€“ reddish in colour โ€“ and could have suffocated the river by reducing how clear the water is (its turbidity), meaning the opposite of our theory โ€“ there were very few algae to produce oxygen for the fish.  

In either case, the algae hold the key to the ecosystem, and impacts to algae can have biblical effects.  

Toxic blooms 

There are three main types of phytoplankton that can make harmful toxic blooms: diatoms, dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria. These produce toxins themselves. When their abundances reach high enough levels, they become toxic to species in the water, and to humans โ€“ directly and indirectly.  

Shellfish poisoning in the US is caused by algae such as Alexandrium catenella or Karenia brevis (both dinoflagellates) which, when ingested by shellfish such as mussels, can make them deadly to humans.  

Shellfish poisoning explained by Ocean Generation.

More directly, blooms of toxic algae threaten life through the water column. K. brevis is amongst the best studied, as it occurs off the coast of the United States in โ€œred tidesโ€. Fish, marine mammals, elasmobranchsturtles, birds and even coral suffer in waters stocked with high quantities of the toxic algae. K. brevis produces brevetoxin, potent neurotoxins which interfere with normal neural function. It essentially causes nerves to continuously fire, leading to behavioural change, muscular dysfunction and disorientation.  

Blue-green algae are another commonly referred to algal bloom. It is named after the colour of the cyanobacteria that causes it, which can produce a wide array of toxins depending on species, none of which are good in high quantities.  

Australia saw a harmful algal bloom start in March 2025 

In March 2025, South Australia began to feel the effects of a huge algal bloom. As of February 2026, the bloom has impacted 20,000 square kilometres and roughly 30% of Australiaโ€™s coastline. Over a million marine animals have died, from over 550 different species. Humans have suffered from eye and skin irritation, coughing and shortness of breath.  

The finger was initially pointed at Karenia mikimotoi, a well-known species that often blooms around the world. But after brevetoxins were identified, which K. mikimotoi doesnโ€™t make, researchers took another look using DNA sequencing. This identified K. cristata, which had only been previously found in Newfoundland, Canada in 2014 and in South Africa in 1988.  

This is one of the largest and longest harmful blooms recorded, affecting a huge range of marine animals. Leafy sea dragons are one of the state symbols for Southern Australia, but the bloom has hit their populations hard enough that their populations are being reassessed for risk of extinction.  

When does an algal bloom become deadly

The simple answer is when there is too much.  

Too much of any one species results in imbalance. Harmful algae blooms come when the balance is lost, for example with an excess of nutrients or an Ocean that is much warmer than usual. Pollution and climate change are increasing the frequency of harmful algal blooms. Not every algal bloom is caused by human activity, but more of them are, and they are more likely to be harmful. Tackling climate change and pollution protect animals like the leafy sea dragon. 

Algae facilitated life on our planet, filling the atmosphere with oxygen. Still today, every second breath you take comes from the Ocean, specifically the little algal friends at work. They continue to be the foundation of marine food chains. Algae are amazing; you just donโ€™t want too much.  

When does an algal bloom become deadly? Explained by Ocean Generation.

Why krill matter: Krill fishing and conservation in the Southern Ocean

Subscribe

Monthly: Impact in your inbox.

OceanGeneration-Join

The Hidden Price of Feeding Langkawiโ€™s Eagles

The Hidden Price of Feeding Langkawis Eagles. A Wavemaker Story.

From charcoal industry impacts to tourism feeding, Langkawiโ€™s iconic raptors face potential challenges in their mangrove habitat. 

Itโ€™sย ten oโ€™clock in the morning when Danial*, our tour guide, welcomes us aboard a small speedboat. We are setting out to explore Kilimย Geoforestย Park, one of three UNESCO-protected reserves in Langkawi, Malaysia.

Covering 40 square kilometres, the park is an impressive mosaic of mangrove forests and karst formations, and an oasis rich with flora and fauna. Among its most notable residents are the White-bellied sea eagle (Haliaeetus leucogaster) and the Brahminy kite (Haliasturย indus). The latter is widely believed to have given Langkawi its name,ย derived from the Malay word โ€œhelangโ€, meaning eagle, and kawi, a red stone found on the island.ย ย 

Why are mangrove roots important? 

As the speedboat glides along the coast, Danial begins to explain the importance of red and black mangrove trees. Mangroves are a complex, interdependent web of aerial roots, sediments, and micro-organisms that stabilise coastlines and sustain marine biodiversity.

These habitats support a rich mix of terrestrial and aquatic wildlife, including more than 41 species unique to the mangroves at Kilim. They function as vital nurseries for young fish and crustaceans and provide refuge for distinctive creatures such as mudskippers, crabs, and kingfishers. Around 34 species, largely crustaceans and molluscs, also underpin a thriving, seafood-based livelihood for the local community.

Why are mangrove roots important? Explained by Ocean Generation.
Mangrove trees at Kilim Geo-Forest Park, 2025 . Photo by Erika Lau

Furthermore, mangrove forests act as powerful carbon sinks, absorbing up to five times more carbon than tropical rainforests. They act as the first line of defence against floods and extreme weather. Their dense, tangled roots dissipate the energy of powerful Ocean waves, including those from the 2004 Andaman tsunami, which left Langkawi with only one known casualty. By contrast, neighbouring coastal areas of Thailand without such natural defences suffered devastating losses. 

Soon, we enter a river delta. Towering shrubs rise on both sides, and the speedboat slows as we drift past the banks. Spiny, intertwined roots pierce the brackish water. This intricate network functions as a natural ultrafiltration system, excluding salt from the water that nourishes the trees. Any excess salt that slips through is stored in the leaves, later shed by wind, rain, or decay. 

The ghost of charcoal past 

โ€œIn the past, mangrove wood was used for the charcoal industry,โ€ Danial explains. โ€œWe would slowly burn the wood in kilns over several weeks. The charcoal produced was ofย very highย quality. Less smoke. More aroma when grilling food.โ€ย 

We approach what looks like the remnants of a beehive-shaped chamber: a crumbling stack of centuries-old bricks, once part of a charcoal kiln that powered the archipelago. In the 18th century, Langkawi relied heavily on charcoal for fuel and transport. The craftย ofย charcoalย makingย was intricate and labour-intensive, passed down through generations. Trees were typically harvested on a rotational cycle, allowing them to reach their 30-year maturity.ย ย 

But because charcoal was cheap, many producers ignored these limits, cutting beyond what was sustainable. Overharvesting degraded the land and destroyed fish nurseries**, dealing a blow to the fishing industry. With the rise of coal and natural gas,ย charcoal use dwindled in the late 1980s,ย and by the early 2000s, production was banned entirely to preserve Langkawiโ€™s mangroves.ย 

We pass the kiln, leaving its ghost in the past.ย 

In the past, mangrove wood was used for the charcoal industry. A Wavemaker Story, posted by Ocean Generation.

Eagles return 

โ€œBecause the fish no longer had habitats or breeding grounds, they began to move away,โ€ Danial says. โ€œAnd do you know who was affected next? The Brahminy kites.โ€ย 

On cue, a rusty-orange bird with an ivory belly and sharply bent wing tips swoops overhead. It heads toward a wide bend in the river, where several boats are anchored, a cloud of similar birdsย spirallingย above.ย 

โ€œI have a friend who was a pilot at Langkawi airport,โ€ Danial continues gravely. โ€œHe told me the eagles began moving toward the runways in search of food. There wereย near-missesย with planesย because theย eaglesย flew too close to them. It was too dangerous.ย We had to find a way to lure the eagles back to the mangroves***.โ€ย ย 

Feeding controversy 

We join three or four other tour boats, each carrying around ten passengers, all huddled together for Langkawiโ€™s main tourist attraction: eagle feeding. From a boat opposite ours, I watch a guide hurl a bucket of creamy scraps into the water. Instantly, the air erupts with movement. One after another, the eagles dive towards the surface with astonishing precision to snatch the floating morsels, like arrows released from a bow.ย ย 

The spectacle is divisive. Some naturalists argue that feeding eagles chicken skin, high in fat, growth hormones, andย sourced from commercially farmed birds, may compromise their health compared toย a natural diet of fish, insects, and small birds. The food may introduceย unfamiliar bacteria and disease,ย a risk that is further heightened by theย large concentration of eagles in one area.

Regular feeding can alsoย disrupt hunting behaviour, with potential knock-on effects on breeding, social patterns, andย survival skills****.ย And then there is the conservation purist perspective, strongly upheld byย WWFย which neither condones nor promotes any form of feeding involving wild animalsย and instead advocates for a strict observe from a distance approach to wildlife tourism.ย Many of these concerns draw on findings from other contexts rather than direct evidence here, and due to limited funding, thereย remainsย an urgent need for further research into the long term ecological and behavioural effects of these feeding practices.ย ย 

Brahminy kites, iconic species of Langkawi, Malaysia.
1st eagle image by: Afsar Nayakkan, 2nd eagle image by: Charles J. Sharp

The debate is not new. I write this in the spring of 2026, but a quick search online shows the problem has persisted far too long. A South China Morning Post article from ten years ago describes the very same issue. Complaints on Tripadvisor date back nearly two decades.

Since my trip, I have been in conversation with numerous local academics, tour guides, and naturalists, to better understand the situation. One of them was present during the original decision to introduce eagle feeding, coincidentally the same pilot mentioned in Danialโ€™s story. He explained that when the practice began in the late 1990s, it was intended as a temporary measure lasting only a single generation of birds, roughly thirty years. If that timeline holds, the practice should be phased out by the end of this decade.  

In reality, the situation is far more complex. Over time, eagle feeding has become embedded in the fabric of Langkawiโ€™s tourism economy. Nearly three million visitors arrive each year, and as Langkawi Business Association adviser Datuk Alexander Isaac notes, โ€œabout 90 percent of Langkawiโ€™s economy depends on the businesses generated in the tourism sector.โ€ For many boat operators and guides, this attraction is a steady and reliable source of income. 

Langkawiโ€™s main tourist attraction is the controversial eagle feeding. Explained by Ocean Generation.

But economic value cannot be the final measure. If rigorous studies eventually show that the practice starves the very species it celebrates, then it must either be stopped or reshaped into a safer alternative. Without adequate research, the island risks sustaining a tradition that could undermine its own emblem. 

Perhaps the way forward lies not in feeding, but in reimagining our relationship with these birds and, more broadly, with wildlife. Solutions should draw on models that decouple income from feeding spectacle. Studies in Thailand and the Philippines have shown that when communities phase out direct feeding and instead promote guided observation, mangrove tours, and citizen science, both wildlife and livelihoods can thrive.  

As I watched the raptors recede into the lush green backdrop, I wondered if true ecotourism could mean learning to admire without interfering, to give back more than we take. 

I hope that in the decade to come, my experience here will feel like the kiln we saw on the riverbank: a relic of the past and a reminder of what was, rather than what continues to be. 


Notes

*ย The name has been changed to protect the personโ€™s identity.ย 

**ย I consulted an academic specialising in the charcoal industry in Malaysia, who rejected claims that the industry in Langkawi at the time had any direct detrimental impact on the mangroves, let alone on fish populations.ย 

***ย Several tour-guides I spoke withย maintainย that eagle feeding was introduced to encourage Brahminy kites to return to the mangroves after ecological decline. However, another academic offered a different explanation: that following Langkawiโ€™s designation as a duty-free island in 1987, feeding eagles became a way to attract and entertain a growing influx of tourists. Whether the practice began primarily as a conservation measure or as a tourism strategyย remainsย unclear.ย 

****ย Interestingly, a local bird ecologist I consultedย observedย no noticeable changes in eagle behaviour from the feeding activities.ย 


Thank you for raising your voice for the Ocean, Erika!

Connect with Erika on Instagram. Learn about how to submit your own Wavemaker Story here.

Why krill matter: Krill fishing and conservation in the Southern Ocean

Subscribe

Monthly: Impact in your inbox.

OceanGeneration-Join